• xxce2AAb@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    20 days ago

    I guess we’ve got no choice but to acquit him then. I guess insurance companies will just have to take… The hit.

  • nublug@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    20 days ago

    i’m prolly wrong, and this is a wild pull, but doesn’t dude also look like the guy who was caught on vid smashing up autozone windows in 2020 with like a $300 full face gas mask?

  • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    20 days ago

    What doesn’t make sense to me is how the guy who did it was fully masked with clear indication that he knows to cover his face.

    Whereas Luigi was just some dude in a hoodie.

    Legally you can wear a mask everywhere so I have a hard time believing the shooter who 3D printed a gun kind of forgot to mask up a few times.

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    Wait, I thought everyone groomed and shaped their bushy unibrow immediately before hunting for healthcare executives? Isn’t that the current style?

  • sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    20 days ago

    NGL the CCTV footage looks closer to Max Verstappen than Luigi.

    …do we know what Max was doing on Dec. 4th, 2024? That IS the F1 off-season…

  • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    I hate that people don’t understand that shitty video can’t be analyzed to get an accurate event reconstruction based on small details. Not saying that this is or isn’t Luigi, I’m saying that trying to utilize what little facial features are available on this bad video shouldn’t be used as evidence against or for his case without other supporting data.

    Poor quality video is not an accurate reconstruction of reality. Compression issues can create visual artifacts like blurring, pixelation, obscuration, or banding. Hell, even different lens types can distort someone’s looks to a huge degree.

    • mkwt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      The crazy thing is we now have algorithms that can do the CSI “enhance!” thing. But it’s still just making shit up that seems plausible.

      Once the information is no longer in the image, it’s not there. No amount of fuckery will bring back the real information.

    • Cassa@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      20 days ago

      confessed wait rly? I have not seen anything about Mangione confessing to the crime?

      just what could easily be planted evidence like a manifesto and a 3d printed gun 🤷

    • glimse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      20 days ago

      Uhhh because Luigi and I were hanging out in a different state the day of the murder? Dumbass

    • Tippy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 days ago

      A brand new account claiming that a blurry row res photo of 10% of someone’s face is evidence of murder, and lying that the patsy confessed (Luigi and his defense team have plead not guilty, and the case is ongoing) to try and bolster their weak position

      Friendly reminder that MAGA and the feds know what the fediverse is and try to push propaganda here just like every other social media

      • Tippy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        20 days ago

        The actual reasonable take that Mangione has confessed?

        Should be very easy for you to show us your evidence of that then, given this case is highly publicized and court records are public in the US. Got a link?