• Cethin@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Again, when I install something from the AUR (which is not where most software comes from —99+% are from official repositories) it isn’t given a special term. It’s the exact same situation as “sideloading” but we just call it installing. Can you explain what the difference is between them?

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      24 hours ago

      —99+% are from official repositories

      LOL you just lumped every other repository into one and then excepted the AUR for…reasons?

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        Because the AUR is by users. The others aren’t.

        I know you just can’t explain the difference though so wrote this instead.

        • Ulrich@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          22 hours ago

          I don’t understand what that has to do with this conversation?

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            19 hours ago

            Wow, you’re frustrating. If using an unofficial source for applications is called sideloading, why isn’t that term used for desktop computing? The term only exists for phones. The AUR is an unofficial user-run source and is equivalent to a source other than the play/apple store. If that term was actually useful or needed we call installing applications from the AUR sideloading, but we don’t. Clearly the term has no real utility besides making it sound like something you shouldn’t do.

            • Ulrich@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              18 hours ago

              Wow, you’re frustrating. If using an unofficial source for applications is called sideloading, why isn’t that term used for desktop computing?

              You are also frustrating, asking me questions that I’ve already answered: Because 99% of people aren’t using the default app store on desktops.

              • Cethin@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                15 hours ago

                Yes they are! That’s what I’m saying. 99% of apps aren’t coming from the AUR. Why don’t we call it sideloading, if it were actually a term that were needed?

                • Ulrich@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  15 hours ago

                  I don’t understand what you’re saying. The point is not that 99% of apps aren’t coming from anywhere, it’s that they are coming from somewhere…

                  • Cethin@lemmy.zip
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    8 hours ago

                    Same thing. 99% of apps are coming from official repositories. A tiny fraction are coming from non-official sources, like the AUR. It should be called sideloading if the term actually had a technical need. Obviously your reasoning that we need the term is wrong. No one feels the need for it on desktop. What’s different about mobile?