• BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    5G was a scam. Promises were impossible to fulfill and investment forums were full of paid shills propping up the telcom stocks. In reality 5G has the exact same throughput as 4G. Nothing changed

    • xinayder@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Roaming in 5G is definitely a step up from 4G. I don’t know the exact tech behind it, but the home region profile is replicated while roaming, meaning you get lower latency and faster speeds. In 4G and prior, the user device had to call back home, which would send back the data, and if you’re in another continent it means 200ms+.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 hours ago

    In any next generation of cell phone networks, the providers should be forced to fill up all blind spots on the network with the new technology before they are allowed to upgrade existing networks.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      They certainly shouldn’t be allowed to sell 6G contracts when they’ve got the grand total of four towers up and an estimated completion plan way off in 2039.

  • DisasterTransport@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    mistakes like selling the evolutionary upgrade of the previous generation as the revolutionary next generation? That kind of mistake?

    Never forget that the original 4G spec promised gigabit.

    • Kairos@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      4G is gigabit the problem is the users don’t exist in a void where they have their own cell tower and also don’t all have expensive devices and also radio interference exists cause of the sun, etc. Same with WiFi.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I’d like a different letter while we’re at it as well. I think q would be good. I want 2q data.

    • python@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      12 hours ago

      We should follow in the footsteps of many tech companies and stop numbering the Gs in favour of tagging on the year they were launched. So next year we wouldn’t get 6G, we would get G2027. Sounds much cooler, doesn’t it?

      • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Or change the G to Gen like it always is when used as an abbreviation for generation, so that people don’t think it means GHz or Gb/s…

  • baggachipz@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    “This network? It goes to 6.”

    “Is it faster?”

    “Yeah, it’s one faster.”

    “So why not just make 5 the top number, and make 5 faster?”

    “This network goes to 6.”

        • kiterios@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Instantaneously? I wonder what kind of noise would be made by the simultaneous formation of billions of vacuums and pressure waves? And how loud would it be on aggregate? And would it be enough to wake those who were asleep at the time?

          • Chozo@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            It’ll sound like a low rumbling of bubble wrap shifting across the lands.

            • ferrule@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              I don’t think there would be much of a pressure change. All the outies would become innie lowering the pressure and all the innies becoming outies would bring it back up.

              Maybe your ears might pop.

              • frongt@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                19 hours ago

                Most animals are smaller than humans. If it’s selected randomly out of unique species then definitely, because there are a fuckton of insects.

    • jimmy90@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      I wonder if the people has believed the 5g conspiracy fantasies feel remotely foolish

      Obviously are intellectually and or mentally diverse so maybe this was just one more inevitable step to total downfall

      • otp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 day ago

        I wonder if the people has believed the 5g conspiracy fantasies feel remotely foolish

        They don’t. In fact, they don’t believe they were wrong. They’ve cherry-picked their array of half-truths and benign or unprovable conspiracy theories and have never reevaluated since. Or they’ve morphed their beliefs into cheap versions of the nonsense they once took as true.

        Even with the covid vaccine conspiracy theories. They were saying that everyone who took the vaccine would die.

        To maintain their “rightness”, when questioned, they will point to the statistics of the non-zero number of people who did die from taking the vaccine.

        When pointed out that the actual number is much closer to 0 than the 100% that they had been saying in 2021 or so, they will argue that there’s a coverup or something. Or that they didn’t literally mean 100% of people.

        Obviously they meant whatever would make them right. Some people can hardly fathom the fact that they believed something to be incorrect.

  • zurohki@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I’ll just be happy if they have basic things like VoIP and emergency call handling properly defined.

    Australia shut down our 2G and 3G networks, and it’s been an absolute dumpster fire.

    A bunch of early 4G phones drop back to 3G for voice calls, but that’s really easy to check for and that’s mostly old phones anyway.

    The real dumpster fire was emergency calls. It turns out there’s phones in the wild with fully functional VoLTE but internal logic that forces them to drop back to 3G or 2G specifically for emergency calls.

    Other phones can make emergency calls, but only on certain networks - a phone will try any available network regardless of SIM card when making emergency calls.

    Or a phone can make emergency calls on any network - but only if it’s running the correct modem firmware version.

    Or it’ll work on any network if it has a Telstra SIM card, but if it has an Optus card it can’t make an emergency call on Telstra because it isn’t running the Telstra-specific VoLTE code anymore.

    The best part is that this emergency call functionality depends on you specifically dialling the emergency number, so there’s no way to test any device other than actually dialling an emergency.

    • frongt@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Call the nonemergency number and ask them how they want you to handle dialing the emergency number. Usually it’s “yeah we got you, just call it and confirm it’s not an emergency”. Phone techs do this all the time.

      • zurohki@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Yeah but you need everyone to do this, and also do it repeatedly with different networks in range. They aren’t set up for that sort of volume.

    • Randelung@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      Gotta love the non testable features.

      “Can we place a test call?”
      “Why would you want to do THAT?”

      • zurohki@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        You can place test calls, but emergency calls are magically handled differently and the only way to trigger that is to make an emergency call.

        Carriers can test phones in their labs, but they have no way to know what modem firmware end users are running. The same hardware sold in different places can have different software images loaded.

        • DasSkelett@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Well, from a technical standpoint, nothing speaks again adding another number to the emergency number list (there’s already multiple across the world and even within most countries) that’ll be handled the same up until somewhere very close to the destination, where it’ll be routed into an answering machine.

          • zurohki@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            17 hours ago

            You could do that, but you know some of these manufacturers will treat the test number as a special case that works differently to real emergency numbers. And half of the rest will treat it as a normal number, so dial it normally.

  • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    94
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    None of this makes sense!

    With 3G, we had clearly defined speeds, and what constitutes 3G.

    4G mostly defined itself, but it left a bit of grey area.

    Then 5G was posting speeds slower than 4G’s top speed. There was never a defined speed range. The term 5G is nothing more than marketing. It means nothing.

    I haven’t even heard of 6G, but given how shit 5G’s handling went right from the start, I assume 6G has to be inserted anally.

    • njordomir@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Yes, also, it should be criminal for home internet providers and phone service providers to conflate, directly or by implication, the “G” in 5G (fifth generation) and the “G” in 10G (ten gigabit).

      I saw a commercial one day that went something like “Our competitors only have 1G; we have 5G. Don’t you want to have the most Gs? We have the best Gs, no one has Gs like us. Don’t settle for inferior Gs, call today!”

      I remember commenting on the switch from 3g to 4g back around 2009 or so and they were already being deceptive in a lot of ways back then. Telecommunications has been a cesspool for decades.

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        “Our competitors only have 1G; we have 5G. Don’t you want to have the most Gs? We have the best Gs, no one has Gs like us. Don’t settle for inferior Gs, call today!”

        Sounds like a commercial for that trump phone.

    • kewjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      5g is rebranded 4g during the rollout for 4g most providers couldn’t hit the bandwidth targets so they branded things 4g LTE or 4g+ to denote it wasn’t actual 4g. when they caught up and could actually support 4g they realized everyone thought lte or + were better because of course more things = better so they just changed it to 5g

    • just_another_person@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      5G was mostly about cramming more connections into the spectrum and expanding broadcast range (as well as some other things), but it wasn’t just about node speed on the network.

      • Glitchvid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        2 days ago

        And it ended up posting significantly faster speeds in dense areas where they actually deploy the technology. My phone has hit 4Gb/s on it.

        • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          2 days ago

          In a lot of places it got worse. At least I had reliable service inside my house on 2G and 3G. Now that those are gone, I have to use WiFi calling or try to find a spot outside where I may be able to get a bar of 5G if I’m lucky.

          • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            23 hours ago

            You’re more secure using wifi calling anyway.

            Unless you’re using 5g NR SA which is the actual 5g - New Radio Stand Alone, which is supposed to be able to function, as the name implies, alone, without any fallback to insecure networks.

            If you’re using 5g NR NSA it still requires 4g to function.

            I am in airplane mode 99.9% of the time, using wifi calling (sms/rcs also work over wifi), so my phone isn’t susceptible to imsi catchers and such or location pinging.

            Yes, I’m paranoid.

            Everyone should be.

            • softotteep@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              13 hours ago

              If you’re that paranoid, then you shouldn’t be using RCS. It’s owned by google. XMPP and Matrix are secure, decentralized alternatives that don’t give your data to google.

            • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 hours ago

              The WiFi calling can be a bit buggy. Sometimes I answer the phone and there’s no audio. I have to reboot the phone to get it to work again. I should just get a VoIP line to use at home.

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      2 days ago

      It was always meant to be great in dense areas, which it is, but marketers went all apeshit promising that it was going to be the second coming of Christ. Instead they should have shut the marketers ina corner and called it what it is, an enhancement to 4g. That 4g and 5g would hand off interchangeably.

      This is why you should never let business dictate tech. They think they know what they’re talking about but they don’t, and end up pissing everyone off.

    • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      I hate to tell you this, but 3G was a lie too. 3g should have been good to 100mbps.

  • Danarchy@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    This is like whan they came out with 3 and 4 blade razors and then just made all the same mistakes with the Mach 5 and its ilk

  • ifmu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I’m just waiting for 6G to make an iCarly reference.