The [AI] safety stuff is more visceral to me after a weekend of vibe hacking,” Lemkin said. I explicitly told it eleven times in ALL CAPS not to do this. I am a little worried about safety now.

This sounds like something straight out of The Onion.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_equivalence

You know what, at this point I’m starting to believe United Healthcare’s CEO wasn’t even killed, it’s a setup. Think about it: the guy was divorced, probably with large sums to pay each month for his ex-wife and children who didn’t like him. He made decisions that killed people, he knew about growing anti-healtcare / anti-billionaire sentiment in the US and felt his life was at risk. What better plan than faking your own death, especially in a high profile case like this when you’re guaranteed that NYPD would frame someone who would take all the attention away from you while you’re quietly fleeing the country. 4d chess right there.

I agree with your point, I’m not really convinced he’s the shooter but the general feeling I have, from my limited knowledge of how the police, the judicial system and murderers work, the pictures that everyone saw and all, is that there’s a real possibility he’s the shooter. But of course we have to let the courts decide.

I’m just tired of everyone saying he didn’t do it based on nothing more than anecdotal evidence and a general hatred for anything that looks like a cop.

I’m old enough to have known a time when online discussion was mostly rational and respectful, and it bothers me how it has slowly become so polarized and emotional.

You can cover 3 miles in a few minutes in NYC.

He could have changed his backpack.

His face wasn’t visible in the pictures of the shooting, the ones I saw at least.

NYPD might be famous for framing people, but they also catch real murderers sometimes, in high or low profile cases.

Occam’s razor says he did shoot the guy.

And what’s that reason?

I saw a lot of comments saying Luigi didn’t do it, but no convincing argument. Personally I think he shot the guy (but I’m open to change my mind) and that he’s some kind of hero for it.

If I understand the judicial system, the prosecution has to make that proof. So yeah as long as the trial hasn’t started there shouldn’t be any proof.

Why?