

It’s good that you love that because you had no point. A bunch of people achieving one single specific outcome is not competing with anyone.


It’s good that you love that because you had no point. A bunch of people achieving one single specific outcome is not competing with anyone.


Right, spend all this time to self train a hobby model for one specific scenario which “Big LLM” would deliver by the time you’re back from lunch.
This illusion that plebs can easily use personal LLMs is the argument that AI companies will use to justify why they shouldn’t be reigned in or held accountable for their impact on society and economy.


Your private LLM will have nothing to compete against the big guys though. A cute hobby project but nothing of economic value.


We created a place for open discussion
It’s a WhatsApp chat.


I won’t be telling them to use crucial anymore
We yes, because eventually the supply would wind down.


someone setup a passkey on a shared google account at my job
I can use the passkey to sign in with my phone, but only I can do that


Yes I read that. That’s the boilerplate statement from the company that is obviously factually incorrect.
Work on your comprehension skills, it will help you in life.


Did you ask some AI to summarise the article? Because there’s no mention of it being a pet cat.


No ones asking you to stick some shiny thing up your ass and walk around to see how it fits. If you don’t like these services don’t use them, for most of us the convinience of an Internet connected device that let’s you stream content published to the Internet is a value.
It’s a meme, Karen.