How does saying that such hostile treatment is abnormal “erase” anyone’s lived experiences?
If you tell someone who lived only eating one meal a day during elementary school that they did not have a normal childhood, you are directly commenting ON their “lived experience”, not erasing it.
You seem to be conflating “that’s not normal” with “that never happens”, which is not reasonable.
The You in U-310 was forced to bear witness to an extinction event. Their psyche will not recover, despite the univ-phasic trauma ripple.
You want to have a non-final product write the training for the next level of bot? Sure, makes sense if you’re stupid. Why did all these companies waste time stealing when they could just have one bot make data for the next bot to train on? Infinite data!
How is that weird? You can be fine with suboptimal stuff, and recognize it’s suboptimal. Some people like their relatives and wished they could talk together more readily. Letters were just the fastest (while economical) method of doing that for a while.
Unless they’ve been using the same sippy cups for decades, I don’t think grandma would’ve helped with this.
While I don’t disagree, (personally, I’m not about it but people should be able to plug in to a local community for common advice of mundane things) parents also just…learned things themselves. And sometimes it wasn’t correct. I’ve spoken to my sister-in-law who told me about all the unsolicited advice she’s gotten about motherhood. And how much of it was basically superstition, not medical advice.
It’s shapeshifting. Extendoknob dongkeys.
Are you talking about a strap-on…or what’s going on here?
Finally! We’re getting some of the cool bits of dystopia. Where can I catch the robo-boxing vod?
How would you get a surprise in the mouth when you’re stuck headfirst in the washer?
This feels like a very Tumblr joke. Purple prose trying too hard to expand on a simple concept, ultimately losing any real connection to the starting context.
You’re right, I did hear something similar to that before.
I haven’t heard much out of Luigi at all (although I admit, I’m not paying that much attention). Sounds to me like he’s just keeping his mouth shut in general and letting his lawyer do the talking. Which is just solid advice for the US legal system.
Okay, nice move: in one play, an oblique dig at my intelligence and dismissing valid questions out of hand without addressing anything.
It isn’t a spy thriller for cops to grab the wrong guy to quickly close a case. It happens to black people all the time.
Why would the real killer have claimed responsibility? That’s assuming the vigilante is serial killer adjacent and was aiming for notoriety thwarting police by killing CEOs instead of normal people.
And why are you assuming that the cabal of rich dickheads could have apprehended the real killer but chose Luigi regardless? Instead of having no reliable suspect and being given a effigy to burn publicly because of a call-in and an over-eager (and corrupt), local police force?
I don’t have personal experience with people suffering psychoses but I would think that, if you have the werewithal to ask questions about the opposite beliefs, you’d be noticeably less likely to get suckered into scams and conspiracies.
Well, maybe let a few more of them get caught up before we make those changes.