0001-01-01

I’m old.

Are Inout sources and volume smart features? Because I don’t need smart features

Zuck has that cash between the cushions of his couch. This is hardly a fine. It should be 10% of income. That will make them obey fast.

They’ll just keep forkin’ and removing that field haha

There is no danger when you stop using their products

Exemptions will be sold by Trump to major manufacturers outside of the US. They will also come with mandatory back doors.

Agreed 100%. There is going to be a problem in the future where people like me are, well, dead. And junior developers never got the hands on experience to learn what I (should) know after so many years.

But, for now, I have to eat. And I no longer care to give my mental health to a project I am not getting an equal share of. So, I am very much enjoying what I can get done.

Humorously, even with near-unlimited power at my fingertips, I still struggle to find any personal projects worth doing. I’ve made a few arcade style phone games and some desktop apps for myself, which are all very nice. But AI cannot write a compelling game story, or design consistent artwork without significant head banging. Sure it can get the ball rolling, but there is always something hollow about it.

This is the direction of things. On one hand, I’m not a full time developer anymore—after 23 years in the industry. On the other hand, I complete projects 100x faster and have more time for my cat.

The trick is to tell it what to do and how to do it, not just talk to it like it knows what it’s doing.

People get upset when it can’t complete features based on high level descriptions. They were told it could, after all. “Build be a website that…” However, that will always lead to disaster.

All that tracking software is bloated.

“The first image in the ‘Nudity’ collection … depicted who I believe to be David Edward-Ooi Poon without a shirt, taking a selfie of himself while sticking out his tongue over an unconscious adult female,” the search-warrant application states. The document goes on to describe the woman in the photo as naked below the waist and wearing a dark-coloured eye mask over her eyes.

The detective alleges that that photograph and others she examined appeared to be stored in a folder on the iPhone titled “Girls I Drugged And Raped.”

Doesn’t sound like hashes to me.

Then it wasn’t hashes

They have a way of making it your problem.

Hug

Yeah but you’d be surprised how people would hate you more for believing in nothing than believing in a bowl of pasta… even if it’s a fake believe in pasta that symbolizes nothing.

What drugs are you on?

The requirement to check age is on the provider. It is not the responsibility of the OS to store age and supply it freely to any service that wants it.

This data is stored as a non-privileged birth date.

This means any website can ask for your birth date. Then they store it, and use it for tracking. Private browser? HAH! Not your birth date!

This has N O T H I N G to do with “children.” It’s about Meta trying to escape moderation responsibility.

This is the right wing talking. Slowly putting identity into the OS for tracking. Don’t fall for it (unless you’re the right wing, and then fuck you)

“The world doesn’t revolve around California”

True, but OS level age verification is a politically conservative talking point. It was pushed by Meta.

Age verification is the responsibility of the PROVIDER (the one who needs to age check) and not on the OS level.

There seems to be a sharp divide between people who hold opposing views, and the right wing is largely behind OS level user identification. Today it’s birth date, tomorrow it’s birth gender.

None of this belongs at the OS level

Anyone downplaying privacy.

I’m shocked to see so many magats on Lemmy