I don’t know, man: AI assistants can put out some really stupid code, and whoever wants shit to “just work” doesn’t care how.
If the developers work in a team, those emails may end up going to whomever holds the company credit card who doesn’t necessarily understand/know/care.
Gross irresponsibility wouldn’t be unheard of for an unscrupulous “tech capitalist” who’s better at promoting by overpromising safety & security & rushing out half-baked minimum viable junk instead of properly implementing it.
Still, someone malicious could as easily do the same in an atmosphere of declining tech savvy.
Did they use Tea app to spill tea about the shitty security practices of Tea app? Do they spill tea there about the app’s founder, Sean Cook, and frivolous claims of a safe space that preserves anonymity?
I don’t even think you can do this via the API
Someone never heard of terraform & similar configuration management software? They enable configuration as code, which can be vibe coded. Practically anything online can be configured via API, especially cloud services.
Was this app made by misogynists? Did they “accidentally” fuck up on purpose?
Why not find out?
they can be fooled too.
Makes it harder: when I go to the wrong website, the manager simply doesn’t suggest credentials (it does not have) for it. That causes me to wonder why.
Without a password manager, a user is never prompted to wonder. They’d simply not notice.
The main weakness
is it’s a pain in the ass.
Some would argue it’s culturally imperialistic to impose US cultural sensitivities on the rest of the international English community. Wasn’t the inventor of git Finnish? The entire world uses git.
Maybe less is better: disability month?
image containing text lacking accessible alternative such as link to accessible source or proper alt text (instead of “July is disability pride month!”)
dat irony: a message to support disabilities begins with an accessible message
physics too hard: nonphysical things can’t kill? preposterous
Basically. Pretending the harm of something physical going wrong (potential to cause real death) is at all comparable to the nonphysical going wrong (a jumble of angry words) is unreal. Lemmy confirms the premise that this discourse & the people spouting it are broken & senseless. The distinction between physical & nonphysical is lost on these loonies.
How do you control the course of a failing rocket? Are you claiming such misdesign is impossible?
The fact remains that unlike with words, a physical potential of death & injury exists in what is technically a missile of significant weight carrying enough explosive substance to escape orbit. The difference between non-0 and 0 possibility of death/injury.
Unless magic exists, words are incapable. Do you claim magic exists? How do mere words cause death without the personal responsibility of something else culpably choosing to take several steps of its own? Or are you arguing the sight of words have deranged you into a mindless killer? If so, maybe you’re the real threat.
Seems like you’re arguing society is dangerous to life: I agree. That’s not a valid argument against words, though.
Again, total lack of perspective & sense.
reading comprehension: none
Don’t know, man: kinda think the potential loss of life from a failing rocket crashing into people matters somewhat more than words. Maybe?
Musk himself seems to abhor guardrails generally—except in cases where guardrails help him personally—preferring to hurriedly ship products, rapid unscheduled disassemblies be damned. That may be fine for an uncrewed rocket, but X has hundreds of millions of users aboard.
In this discourse, anyone else find a broken sense of proportion & consequences at stake?
If you killed Ted Cruz on the floor of the Senate, and the trial was in the Senate, nobody would convict you.
―Lindsey Graham
Maybe people need to learn to not suck as bad, check their sources, ask questions like how do I know this is true?
Basic shit we should have learned long before we reach adulthood? 🤷
This is a sentiment often repeated by manosphere influencers and there’s no actual tangible evidence it exists and I think that’s the real issue.
This is why I feel there is such a disconnect. I just have to open TikTok to see this, so if researchers are not finding evidence then I’m very curious how that’s possible. Heck, you just need to look at the same masculinity influencer content they are talking about to see it, because it’s not just them making shit up from nothing - they will often use clips of misandrist women to get their point across. So they basically find the evidence for you.
Why has no one here said “links”?
People here just talk in circles instead of providing concrete support.
Apple to
Australianseveryone: You’re Too Stupid to Choose Your Own Apps
fix’d
Compelling search engines to deindex results, age verification, chat monitoring: stay golden, EU.