Vegafjord oakframer

This sounds like the trolley problem.

You are right in challenging the words that I’m using. The oakframe is highly experimental, and so there will be words that ends up not getting traction. It is part of the process. It’s similar to how you have to allow yourself make mistakes when trying to do a new waxt. Flawlessness prevents growth.

I think that the word “waxt” has potential; It is culturally rooted in Old English, and works in norwegian as the word “vekst”. Words like these are easy to translate and keeps their poetic nature because the images of the words are universal and all languages has these images.

Thank you for your suggestions! Right now, I’m just posting a little bit everywhere to increase the exposure in different communities and see what resonates. It would be good to have a place to post, but what I really need is honest feedback.

I made the oakframe in an attempt to loken Gaja. It’s a project focusing particularily on the role of the language in how we bring about transformative change, for example through relighting and sighsteer. The question that the oakframe asks us is; How do we move our attention away from the destructive towards lokening.

The oakframe sais Gaja is unwell because of structures of migth which we call the machine, but it also sais that this machine is socially constructed, and so we have the change force to dissolve these structures. The construction of the machine happens through our language and how the language paints our world.

I don’t have an official spot for posting about the oakframe right now, because I’m still in the discovery process. I’m also primarily developing it in norwegian.

It comes from anglish “loken” meaning to heal, it is related to Old English “læce” IPA /ˈlæː.t͡ʃe/ meaning doctor.

https://wordbook.anglish.org/

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/læce#Old_English

Googol is a hitten for great quantities, it worked great as a word, and it would be great if Google lost it as a trademark. However we have the force to seed a new word that has a similar image.

If the internet was an ocean of content, then we could say “let’s ocean it”. Ocean as a verb makes as much sense as the verb google.

Branded language makes us only see one choice, its very anti competitive.

But for real, I think GrapheneOS could take this stand if they’ve got the balls.

But I think the real reason nobody is doing this is the paradigm of reasonability.

Nobody want to step their foot down, because that’s not reasonable. We are supposed to make it work like the wife exposed to domestic violence.

But we need to stop being reasonable and start being assertive.

Im just waiting for somebody to make a plan for resistance. So far the best I have seen is going to the doorsteps of google to cry and beg them to stop.

thats not my cup of tea

go figure

160 kronars is a lot, its not fair.

all corporations are bad

Way to go!

Now, I’m going to become an artist!

Now I know how to draw a bicycle!

The term sideloading default google walldom software by making software outside seem more excotic and less safe.

We can combat this by reframing the terms and making them reflect reality. Calling to engage with google walldom as bloodletting as we are giving up some of our willforce to google, where blood is a symbol of willforce. We can frame to use software outside the google walldom as bearing, as in bearing the blood instead of letting it go.

Bloodletting is to install software by using a walled software store. Bearing is to install software by using unwalled software stores.

I like miniflux. Lightweight, web based, selfhostable, assisted hosting and compatible with third party clients.

Perhaps a bloat to frugal axis and niche to mainstream axis?

What about crowding a datacenter with the goal of burning it down? It creates no values anyways.