I’ll admit that I only know BLM from first hand experience (not a lot) and the news, so I should not speak on the movement as a whole. But I wanted to use it to illustrate my point.
if you believe being a man has some effect that means you can’t have something relevant to add to a conversation
I would not say that this is the problem. More in the lines of whataboutism?
You want to discuss something and other people (often men in the case of feminism, again, in my experience), tries to whataboutism their counterpart (for example a femenist) to make their counterparts arguments invalid in some way.
Back to OP’s comic, here is a real world example: https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-46622772. Emma Knyckare (a Swedish comedian) organized a festival that was “male-free”.
The Sweden’s Discrimination Ombudsman (DO) said that describing an event as “male-free” breached the country’s anti-discrimination laws.






This was on Hacker News: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47911524
Twitter link: https://xcancel.com/lifeof_jer/status/2048103471019434248
Hacker New’s sentiment on this from the comments I’ve read is that it is the author’s own fault.