Media literacy is dying.

The first panel is relevant. The first character(who looks more androgynous than anything) implies women haven’t been honest with them, proceeds to validate why women haven’t been honest with them by reacting poorly to honesty.

Surely, we all have experience with people who feel like they need to demand truth, like that isn’t the default.

It doesn’t even mention men, it’s about self awareness and maturity.

Super weird that a lot of people just glossed over that first panel like it wasn’t a fucked up thing to say.

So you didn’t read the first panel?

Misandrist to say that people who generalize women as dishonest probably give people a reason to lie?

More people need to read this.

Lotta people misinterpreting this as an all-men statement, not seeing how Character A generalizes women’s behavior in the first panel.

Almost like it’s saying “people who think all women are dishonest might be dishonest, themselves.”

When a guy wasn’t taking my soft “no’s” and arguing with my hard “no,” I told him I was “on a filthy cunt of a period with blood-snot bursting out the vagoo.”

Feel free to use that.

Only my friends :)

You just follow me around with your silly little snarks and not getting jokes, doncha? Nice to see you again.

No I’m not.

Did you just link to yourself? Thought that argument was so good you came over here to point at it, let me know?

Either way, your premise is incorrect because this isn’t an argument, nor a statement. For all we know, it’s an anecdote. Perhaps, even a dream.

It’s nature’s wet wipe.

Shit near the treeline, more moss. Sphagnum moss. It’s moist, soft, and grows in big thick clumps so you don’t get any on your hands.

deleted by creator

That’s my favorite one. I have a personal fallacy where I don’t believe anyone who brings up fallacies. You’re a liar and a thief.

Every comic is a logical fallacy if you can’t identify a logical fallacy.

Every time someone says not to ghost them, they turn out to be extra ghostable.

For all we know they started with a group of ten.

I haven’t seen her. You got that onlyfans link?

Does that mean the only proof of the bots and unfair moderation is people saying stuff? No screenshots of messages from the chick asking mods to take down mean comments, or IP addresses for different accounts boosting her posts?

CNN, at least.

I looked it up. I can’t find anything except people furiously agreeing in some hate-filled reddit ouroborus without a beginning. Can you link to something substantial, that isn’t reddit comments or videos about reddit comments?

From what I’ve seen, she posts crowd-pleasing media, seems to like online attention, has been cool with people reworking her comics, lost her shit for a week or so at one point, and has an onlyfans.

How do you know she has bots?