It’s called class consciousness

Reminder that the biggest Nazi-killers were the commies :)

Go ahead and ask them. Or is Harvard also SeeSeePee?

You’re concern-trolling for a particular ethnicity outside your country you know nothing about while continuously disregarding the systematic and much worse abuses against ethnic minorities in your own, because Zionist media told you so.

Conflating Zionism with Judaism is extremely antisemitic, thankfully many Jews are not rabid genociders like Zionists, certainly most I interact with aren’t.

Whenever you pretend to be 1% as concerned about Roma people in Europe or black people in the US as you concern-troll for Uyghurs, you’ll be taken seriously.

You can ask the 800 million people uplifted from such rural poverty over the span of 40 years

Everything is possible when you make shit up!!

But just because the United States is creating/ allowing internment camps and death camps doesn’t mean it’s okay for the Chinese to do it to the Uygurs

But that’s literally made up by the Zionist media apparatus though? Like, you’re comparing actually recorded shootings of civilians by the police on the street (USA) with hearsay stories made up by Zionist media.

Please, everything you know about the Uyghur was manufactured by Zionist media with the “data” of literal cofounder of Victims of Communism Memorial Association and rabid Christian conservative “Adrian Zenz”.

It’s beyond me why after seeing the literal entire western media establishment manufacturing consent for a genocide that we’ve seen televised in our own phones for the first time thanks to Chinese social media such as TikTok, people are still willing to take these same media’s claims at face value when it comes to the human rights of peoples in geopolitically tense regions of the world.

Couldn’t agree more

Oh, sorry, I get it now, thanks for explaining

So?

But statesian republicans don’t advocate for the end of capitalism and an implosion of the country. They’re disgusting, but they’re not accelerationists, they defend hard policy to defend the status quo.

Well, yes, there are a few individuals doing it, that doesn’t affect my main question “how many are doing it? Is it significant?”

I mean, the post says “capitalism bad” so I assumed that the green man is not from the right wing.

The right wing is not really collapsing the system IMO, they’re just taking off its mask and showing how it truly is and has been.

This is kinda mostly a strawman though, no serious political movement advocates for accelerationism, it’s just a strawman used against people further to the left than oneself.

There are a few weird fringe cults who are accelerationist like Posadists (who believe nuclear war or aliens will bring communism), but it’s not by any means a position that holds a good footing in any serious political project.

The strawman often takes claims like “there is not a big practical difference between these two political parties” and twists them into “I would rather have the worse party win”. Also takes descriptive statements like “people usually revolt when hungry” and attributes an intentionality to them, like “I wish more people would go hungry so that they starve more”, as if making an observation about the nature of protest and revolt implied supporting the conditions that create it.

Doesn’t help that the social democrats had murdered the more moderate leaders of the communists (like Rosa Luxembourg) just a few years before that and funded the Freikorps with government funds. How is a small party (KPD) without access to government more accelerationist than the big party in government (SPD) actively funding Nazi death squads to murder communists already a decade before?

Also, the SPD leaders literally flipped its anti-militarist stance overnight when WW1 broke out. Again, who’s the accelerationist, the one protesting against that and being murdered by fascists or the party in government funding said fascists and supporting WW1?

Fully agreed but why the particular focus on the offending nation? You could give similar statistics about, say, Belarus or Poland. To me it’s not morally the same when a Nazi German soldier is killed in combat to when a Belarusian civilian is starved to death in a Nazi concentration camp.

This isn’t even the stupidest point of accelerationism

Agreed, but like, there are no actual accelerationists, it’s mostly a strawman used to misrepresent people who are more radical. Sure, there may be a few random accelerationists around, but there’s no serious political movement anywhere with accelerationism in their policy because it is a very bad idea.

It does, but barely anybody calls themselves an accelerationist, it’s mostly a fringe position and, more commonly, a strawman