Rioting Pacifist

Because any webpage you load has total control of the content it serves, including the plaintext of your emails along with the keys you use to decrypt them.

e2e encryption in browser is effectively not e2e in any meaningful sense, this goes for any thing, but Proton are the worst for trying to convince you that they can’t do this.

Software that is targeting people who might need encryption should be honest about it’s own limitations.

Also their “e2e” is only in the browser, which is only e2e if they don’t get a warrant, at which point it’s trivial for them to get your browser to decrypt everything for them.

I wouldn’t mind Proton if:

1. Their fans weren’t so annoying
2. They didn’t market themselves as more secure than they are

Git was started by Linus but he doesn’t run GitHub

compare that to the cost of running the DeepSeek model on comparable hardware (because it is open weight).

What?

You can’t compare the cost of running a model at home to the cost of running a model operationally as a business.

Or at least nobody should take that comparison seriously.

If OpenAI/Anthropic are selling at a loss

Why the If, we know they are running at huge losses.

Honestly this level of poster analysis is why clankers are able to impress people, everyone has just accepted full bullshit all of the time and nobody is willing to admit the unknowns are significant and the numbers we are being presented are largely unverified/unverifiable!

I’d be ok with age verification if it can be done in an anonyomous way

People lost their shit over a local API with an easily fake-able age bracket.

The problem with hyperventilating over everything, is that there is no benefit to even trying to write reasonable laws as they get painted dishonestly anyway.

Sure but comparing what companies in an industry full of losers make, is pretty meaningless as we don’t know how much companies are losing right now.

Firstly governments should stop blocking immigration then.

Secondly billionaires have gotten richer globally and you can only get richer if you are making others poorer wether it’s directly or by printing money.

This doesn’t mean much they could just be losing 50% more money than their competitors.

TBH We’ll end up with slop cars because capitalism kills innovation not because of AI.

Management are pushing sysadmins to use AI, yet AI tools permissions models are worse than useless.

If this were true, we’d see a lot more animation, the reality is actors are important to the creative process otherwise and the director having to micromanage ai (or let it just produce averages) is only good for producing slop (which admittedly is a lot of what Netflix puts out).

Sorry but your big titted ai GF pretending to love you isn’t art

It’s it easy to generate fake fingerprints though?

Lol, LMAO in fact

Is there a meaningful difference?

OpenAI Anthropic: Be scared we have developed AGI

Also OpenAI Anthropic: our permissions model is dogshit, we just wildcard match strings

They did and they got the tarrifs refunded.

The issue is that with markets nothing is tightly coupled.

Also what happens when the companies are forced to eat part of the tarrif, if the tarrif is 15, but that pushes the prices above the maximum profit point (units sold * per unit profit) then how much tarrif back should the customer get?

All pricing under capitalism is based on uncertainty.

What the market will bare isn’t a known thing.

Side-note: this is why YIMBYs are dumb as fuck when they apply econ101 to rents.