

Some of the arguments for mutual tracking relate to safety, not cheating.
Reddit refuge
Some of the arguments for mutual tracking relate to safety, not cheating.
Yeah. I prefer my delusions of mediocrity.
The line seems to be drawn at choosing whether to charge the murder at a state or federal level. In Luigi’s case, he is being tried federally.
Which asks the question as to why Luigi’s case is being tried federally while mass casualty/terrorism crimes are only being charged at the state level.
But what does she want?
What work does she want?
Because it isn’t controlled by Russia.
There were experiments a few years ago that attempted to see if some primates could learn the concept of money. A coin could be used in exchange for a piece of fruit. Some primates were able to understand that the coin represented fruit.
Those primates discovered prostitution soon after.
I didn’t say AI, I said LLM.
A combination of personal vetting via analyzing output and the vetting of others. For instance, the Pentium calculation error was in the news. Otherwise, calculation by computer processor is understood and the technology is acceptable to be used for cases involving human lives.
In contrast, there are several documented cases where LLM’s have been incorrect in the news to a point where I don’t need personal vetting. No one is anywhere close to stating that LLM’s can be used in cases involving human lives.
Yeah, I figure this isn’t going to be an American only problem.
How are other countries different?
How are other countries handling it? I can’t imagine AI being an American only education issue.
If you want to compare a calculator to an LLM, you could at least reasonably expect the calculator result to be accurate.
Meta is paying to make its bots, Reddit gets it for free!
Employees like this usually cost the company at least double their salary in support and benefits, so you’re probably talking about half that at most.
Along with that, there is probably a lot of R&D expenses as well.
Finally, Meta seems to be subsidizing the consumer hardware, so that’s probably hurting the bottom line even more.
The development of standards doesn’t have to be seen as capitalist, though. There are benefits for non-capitalist economies to define standards as a way to achieve interoperability across different devices. For instance, I don’t see why a communist country wouldn’t standardize a power plug.
Why is Meta lobbying at all?
They want to influence public policy for their benefit.
Why does any private entity have the ear of presidents and congress?
A large part of politics is balancing the needs of different groups.
Are you ok?