If you are a researcher, you shouldn’t have to ask someone for information that is readily available and particularly for that which you should already have intimate knowledge of.
and yet, it is the one thing they are GUARANTEED to figure out in life.
The 15 10 commandments were famously written on 3 2 stone tablets.
Hacker? Not a hacker. This information is broadcast openly.
TIL if(wireless_signal=OR(“tazer”,“bodycam”),“Police Detected”, ) is hacking.
They still keep the record of all the information you provided, likely including email, name, what you purchased, with what payment method, and more.
They will be able to make statistical inferences of your socioeconomic status variables and can and will resell that data to others who will absolutely not give a shit about your unsubscribe status. In the end it may be worth the 15% off for her, but it is definitely not scamming them by unsubscribing.
I’m on Fedora and for me it is as simple as sudo dnf upgrade --refresh -y, Come back in 5 minutes and manually restart.
There is no babysitting required. You can see the realtime progress of the entire process if you want to. It does not need reboots to install other updates. The updates don’t refuse to install if you’ve removed Edge Browser or any other ‘necessary’ (BS) software.
This OP wants you to read an article 2 weeks old.
Usually take a GNOME all over the toilet seat.
The image looks like the contrast was increased too much for unknown reasons.
If it was the law then the AI itself would be coded to not allow going “undercover”, and there would be legal consequences if caught. Torvald’s stance only matters for how things ‘are’ not how they ‘could be’.
Would it be a cure all? Of course not. Fraud still happens despite the illegality. But it’s better than not being able to trust anything ever again.
Perhaps the most discussed technical detail is the “Undercover Mode.” This feature reveals that Anthropic uses Claude Code for “stealth” contributions to public open-source repositories.
The system prompt discovered in the leak explicitly warns the model: “You are operating UNDERCOVER… Your commit messages… MUST NOT contain ANY Anthropic-internal information. Do not blow your cover.”
Laws should have been put in place years ago to make it so that AI usage needs to be explicitly declared.
it was Skype previously, which is what we all used originally. The conversion was complete. My father still has a Skype icon on his phone because it now opens Teams.
Some members are too old to want to switch to something else and I need to save my energy for far more important battles.
I use Teams flatpak to communicate with family and like a week ago got a prompt “would you recommend this to others?”.
I clicked no, and for the reason “Sloppity slop slop slopitty slop” and 3 days later M$ announced they were rolling back Copilot integration in trivial apps. I felt listened to :P
No. You’re just at different levels of not believing. “While I know Jesus existed I’m just not convinced he was the son of a god” and “There is no way any god exists” will both get you to Hell according to the Bible, or beheaded for heresy depending where and when you are.
Like that makes it better.
The last thing someone in this state of mind needs is a reminder that this is an easy possibility. A family member drove truck until someone did this to him. He had to go on comp because the PTSD prevented him from driving ever again and to add insult he got addicted to painkillers from his back injury.
This comic is in bad taste for both making light of the subject of suicide and painting the ill person in such an unsympathetic way. If anyone out there is having dark thoughts at least have the decency not to ruin someone else’s life in the process. Ideally, get help, but don’t do this.
With 'murican healthcare prices the fatality rate is a feature.
They should have had teh dev say ‘it is almost done, just need to work on the UI’ and then get drafted to war where he gets domed by a 50 cal and then completes the project. Would have been more accurate that way.
There’s nothing to discuss. You are clearly biased due to the motivation to defend the publishing body for your research.
Expert scientific bodies all over the globe, including China , Europe , had or have strong criticisms of the MDPI and for very good reasons.
It’s a paper mill where for a fee you can get published in a quarter of the time and work. Yes, the individual journals are the source of the problem but that MDPI constantly includes their crap taints the lot.