49% owned by Rosneft while another 49% are owned by “UCP” (Russia’s United Capital partners). Basically a 100% russian refinery in India…

And that’s why you’re the ace bonobo.

And how about they write the article about that instead of this bullshit article? I don’t get why people are trying to get them off the hook for this clickbait garbage instead of writing proper articles

I love how she looks so ascetic in that last frame, and yet she drew those cute hearts around Horse.

Moms have superpowers, obviously.

I think you’re right and that is how the word is most often used, but at least merriam-webster gives a broader definition, as the “practices or pretensions of a quack”, which it then says is the same as a charlatan, so I guess it would be acceptable. I’m not a native speaker, however… :)

I hate the term “pseudo-science”. Call it what it is: quackery.

Relevant username.

The idiot digs deeper, and shows his true colours. Asinine.

No. We get exactly what his comment is about.

If he was in the renewables camp, there would be no point, in this discussion over solar, to bring up nuclear. It’s absolutely unrelated.

What he’s doing is pushing the thought into people’s heads that nuclear is a good solution, and that’s why I’m calling him out for. For being a shill.

No. I type less.

How idiotic.

Maybe the French word does have that origin, and other languages adapted it “differently”?

In Italian for example, this is called cooking “al cartoccio”, where paper is “carta” and butterfly is something else entirely.

I was trying to check Larousse but it keeps blocking me so meh. Perhaps both are true, as you said.

I’m curious if that origin for the word papillote is accurate, because it’s very close to “paper”.

The word describes not only the cooking method, but the “bags” themselves, which can be made out of paper.

The same word is also used for the hairstyle, as well as the pieces of paper used to create it.

The real life version works in reverse, sadly.

I suspect building a nuclear device is easier. You have my respect.

The shooting “tarnished UnitedHealthcare’s reputation and disrupted its operational stability,” Ge Bai, a professor of health policy and management at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Maryland, told Newsweek.

No, it did not, don’t pin that one on Luigi.

UnitedHealthcare did that all on their lonesome, by profiteering on people’s pain and suffering.

Yes, but the profit growth rate decreased marginally, which was deemed absolutely unacceptable.

A good point, but I’m not sure that’s where the bar is. How does it compare to other self-driving systems that have lidar, for instance?

Ah yes, the “round to 9” method. That one is a worldwide plague.

I’ve seen displays with the lower sized digits, but usually it’s the cents: €149^.99

Adding fractions of a cent to a price display is just so… avaricious. (I’m sure there’s a more common word for this but I could find it)