

Haven’t followed it much (EU), can you elaborate who did what and what can be done potentially?
Haven’t followed it much (EU), can you elaborate who did what and what can be done potentially?
And we can’t access a big part of Russian internet since they have decided for us that it’s all propaganda
Oh no! That is exactly what the EU wants to do.
Are they trying to be as horrible as us?
Like the ‘impartial’ IAEA and their Mosaic system
OC it is about that.
Same with Tik Tok, they don’t like news they can’t control and censor.
https://www.tiktok.com/@middleeasteye/video/7498354878473932054
Or simply bcs they can’t compete with Chinese tech. (Huawei etc)
how is that greenwashing?
Then buying woodpellets from canada, shipping them to EU to fuel an ‘eco’ biomass installation is definitely greenwashing.
But you’re right, Sinophobia is also a pseudo-democrat, lib trait.
That’s what you’re doing.
Schoof and his gand didn’t need PVV to go hard right-wing.
“WIlders has left leaning once” (ones probably) but What?
What I can say is the,name it Rheinland or W-European is less bad than the awful Anglo-countries indeed.
While there was a few decades of good social structures and conditions for workers post WW2 they have been destroying it slowly but surely.
I am Belgian, so I presume you’re a NL neighbour?
I know things have been going down (a lot of you here for free education and bcs buying NL houses are unafordable) and certainly for Germans even under Merkel who made a lot of people work low wage jobs with very little protection, throw away jobs.
And again it’s getting worse.
The NL government is awful and (extreme) right making awful laws.
Like Germany they are among the biggest bootlickers of the genocider state and the US terrorists.
" Sorry, but I assume everybody here at least has a basic level of understanding on the political system"
I certainly do and know the pretty concept of separation of power, if you have trouble with spelling and forming coherent sentences that’s another matter.
When you say "most democratic countries " That means you believe in the solely theoretical concept of democracy, it doesn’t exist.
Or what countries do ypu think have that?
And LOL at using China as a negative example of FR.
England for one is far worse.
And no I do not mean the 1%ers which is a silly concept. I mean the regime/government whose rights and powers far exceed the powers of normal citizens.
Even when the theory/law doesn’t say that in your imaginary democratic state.
“a consuming focussed angelo-saxton country” again, what do you mean?
That is exactly what we in the west call democracies.
It is merely an ultra-capitalist ,so consumer and profit focused concept. The rights are there on paper.
“Based on trias politcal yes you do.” what are you trying to say?
And I said nothing about corruption or ‘people with money’
Again, what are you trying to say?
The plebs and the regime never have the same rights, in any country
FR is definitely used in GDPR countries.
For police it’s so- called ‘tightly regulated’.
For private use forbidden but ‘there are exeptions’
Breaking news!
First animal facial recognition tool invented!
Soon you’ll be able to prove another rancher stole some of your cattle,chickens,etc…
For now only works for pigs.
Non-Anglo here.
Totally not distracted bcs my brain autocorrected it to “all of a sudden” without even noticing.
A bit like “It deosn’t mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are”
Also never seen/heard the “the” variant. (Well consciously that is).
LOL you’re so bad at propaganda.
“The freedom of both women and the general public is not solely dictated by healthcare and the ability to attain higher education”
I never said that, just mentioned one of those still important facts to show they’re better than the US of which I could also mention many more horrible facts.
Freedom is also not defined by wearing a heascarf or not.
Neither does your cherrypicking about access to the external internet.
A temporary measure in time of war, is that the best you got?
And just check my comments from yesterday, turns out I was 100% right.
Iran did indeed a symbolic attack on bases evacuated 5 days ago, even reported then and they gave the USSA warning.
I also said Iran needed the symbolic attack to sell to their people as revenge.
As I predicted in that comment the theatre of BOTH symbolic attacks, the USSA one and the Iranian one are over just to get the ultimate goal:
Pissrahell can have its way out of a losing war since the imaginary nuclear threat is imaginary bombed. And what do you know, just after this they have a ceasefire.
Unfortunate actually that Iran let them off the hook.
Was going great and heartwarming images from occupied Palestine.
See, you don’t understand geopolitics and its optics.
But then again, that’s not your job, spouting(easily debunked)crappy lies and propaganda is.
One day your mummy will teach you to look up easily verifiable facts, other people can do that already right now and see everything I said was accurate and you’re just a weak propaganda tool throwing insults and slander.
Amazing what you can learn if you don’t only gobble propaganda.
That expression LOL
Obstruction of whatever cops do, OK.
But usually it has nothing to do with justice.