AwesomeLowlander

Cmon, you’ve posited two extremely improbable scenarios, do you really need others to point out the more likely ones, that don’t involve us going full Mad Max?

UBI is one of the obvious ones. Tax the means of production, and make sure everybody has the basic necessities for survival.

That’s a classic false dilemma, there’s plenty of other options besides those two extremes.

Wouldn’t call that a job in the current context

I don’t see how that would be practical in any shape or form with society as it exists today, TBH. You’re suggesting limitations on what normal people can own, based on the stated purpose of the asset. That’s going to be impossible to enforce. Why are we even getting one ‘commercial’ robot assigned to us? The average joe isn’t going to be able to make use of it effectively. Just tax the robots and make sure everybody has UBI.

Yep, UBI would solve a lot of social issues currently, including the whole scare about AI putting people out of work.

Not sure what you mean about work robot ownership, care to elaborate?

Losing unnecessary jobs is not a bad thing, it’s how we as a society progress. The main problem is not having a safety net or means of support for those who need to find a new line of work.

Assuming you lived in a place with access to a library like you mentioned, that is. For me, libraries were a once a month thing growing up.

Aside from the ridiculousness of reading anything malicious in an unordered comparison list…

In 2012, a great amount of priming research was thrown into doubt as part of the replication crisis. Many of the landmark studies that found effects of priming were unable to be replicated in new trials using the same mechanisms.[10] The experimenter effect may have allowed the people running the experiments to subtly influence them to reach the desired result, and publication bias tended to mean that shocking and positive results were seen as interesting and more likely to be published than studies that failed to show any effect of priming. The result is that the efficacy of priming may have been greatly overstated in earlier literature, or have been entirely illusory.[11][12]

New comic, author’s still finding his feet I guess

Darwinism at work again.

Um. You did notice panel 10 - 12, right?

Not that I have a particular problem with desire paths, but what’s shown in the comic here is an example of how the design changed to take into account how people are interacting with it, and yet it didn’t work out.

Slay*

Nah, there’d be nobody around for them to torture anymore, or to appreciate this particular bit of fuckery. The wish as it is is bad enough there’s no need to twist it.

It’s amazing how bad the quality of the writing is, for an article that’s complaining about ChatGPT.

It’s not ‘lying’ when they don’t know the truth to begin with. They could be trying to answer accurately and it’d still be dangerous misinformation.

So space launches will run for another two years before being permanently cancelled?

That sounds like a you problem, not a them problem, as far as they’re concerned

Funny, there’s a lot of people on lemmy itself (especially around dbzer0) who would agree with the judge wholeheartedly.

What’s the defaultism here?