compostgoblin@slrpnk.net to Comic Strips@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agoISO 8601slrpnk.netimagemessage-square11fedilinkarrow-up18arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up18arrow-down1imageISO 8601slrpnk.netcompostgoblin@slrpnk.net to Comic Strips@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square11fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareargh_another_username@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-23 months agoBut… that’s not the right way. Are you saying the ISO8601 violates ISO8601? so, apparently not I just whooshed, I didn’t even noticed the dates are ambiguous.
minus-squarepalordrolap@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 months agoThe joke is that they’ve not been given in ISO8601 format, and also that they’re both ambiguous. For the second one, we can’t even tell which of the ends is the year.
minus-squareSuperNovaStar@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 months agoHonestly Randall absolutely would put the year in the middle just to fuck with us
minus-squarebrsrklf@jlai.lulinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 months agoPublication 1988-06-05, latest amendment 2004-12-01. I almost expected the two dates to use different formats, but no, they’re just both “the American way”.
minus-squareSuperNovaStar@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 months agoWell you can only cram in so many jokes at once. Would have been funny though
But… that’s not the right way. Are you saying the ISO8601 violates ISO8601?
The joke is that they’ve not been given in ISO8601 format, and also that they’re both ambiguous. For the second one, we can’t even tell which of the ends is the year.
Honestly Randall absolutely would put the year in the middle just to fuck with us
Publication 1988-06-05, latest amendment 2004-12-01.
I almost expected the two dates to use different formats, but no, they’re just both “the American way”.
Well you can only cram in so many jokes at once. Would have been funny though