• TxzK@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Codeberg exists. But no people still have to just flock to corporate bullshit and then be surprised when they pull a corporate bullshit.

    • cmhe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Codeberg is great, but it is hosted in Germany, and subject to their laws. AFAIK, Germany has laws against tools for “circumventing copy protection”, or “hacking”.

      So I am not sure that they can provide a save haven for tools, where some lawyer could argue these points successfully in front of a court.

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        ActivityPub is amazing for censorship because anything that gets posted to one instance gets immediately archived thousands of times over.

      • zer0@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Also has the highest rate of website take-downs/bans. To be fair: mostly revenge “naked pictures of my ex” websites. But yeah. Piracy + Germany = not good. You’d rather turn to the Netherlands for that.

  • ChickenAndRice@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I was wondering why these types of open source projects always push to Github, despite the latter always complying with DMCA. (I get that Github provides discoverabilty features, but it just isn’t worth it to have all your work taken down).

    On a similar note, has anyone tried out https://radicle.xyz/? It’s supposed to actually make use of git’s peer to peer nature (and not the client server model that everyone adopts with git) and ideally provide discoverability features.

    The said I’ve only read the faq and haven’t actually tried it myself. Basically I’m wondering if it’s worth doing a deep dive on this technology

      • Matty_r@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        CodeBerg is a public instance of Forgejo. You can run your own local instance of Forgejo.

        At some point they’ll have federation working so you’ll be able to use your home instance of Forgejo to interact with other projects/instances.

      • jayandp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Canada might start ignoring DMCA as a whole if the idiots in my government keep harassing them. Maybe that’ll piss off Hollywood and friends in a useful way…

        (Just ignore me laugh weeping at the prospect that billionaires stabbing each other in the back is the only thing I can look forward to in my country now)

  • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Widevine, BTW, is a Google product that all the browser vendors agree to use. Its the only reason HTML5 has gotten anywhere.

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Its crazy that we can’t agree on any international rules except the ones that protect IP hoarding

  • Whirling_Cloudburst@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    There needs to be a widespread p2p solution for opensource projects before its too late. I have lost count of all the amazing stuff that has been gravity bombed from orbit.

    There also needs to be a way for authors to submit things anonymously too and maybe sign their things with cryptographic keys to ID it. How many times has a company had a court order someone to cease and desist or simply acquire somebody’s work?

  • doodledup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    The mentioned repositories enable and encourage criminal behavior. And it’s quiet intentional. It’s because of piracy that we have DRM in the first place. The audacity now of pirates to wine about them not getting what they want like the entire world revolves just around them.

    • HyperfocusSurfer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Baseless (and also wrong) assumption that piracy is responsible for by any means significant monetary losses aside, there are other reasons for bypassing that DRM bullshit. Like, off the top of my head:

      • archiving – when you don’t have a local copy of a piece of content, it can be changed or deleted at any time;
      • ability to access stuff on a wider range of devices – I want to be able watch my favorite coomtent creator in full resolution on my phone that has only L3 and quite outdated version of widevine without installing proprietary crapp, so what;
      • bypassing bullshit restrictions – not sure if onlyfans in particular does that, but we have Netflix, for example, that would tell you to fuck off when you’re not watching from home be it VPN or an actually different location when traveling.
      • doodledup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Also baseless assumptions.

        Btw, you don’t need to use whatever service you don’t own if you disagree with their practices. DRM is shit. But you’re not in any position to elevate yourself above that. You don’t own the services and you have not contributed in creating the protected content. You have no right to decide anything.

        • HyperfocusSurfer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Agreed to disagree then. IMO, if a company thinks it’s OK to throw me over the dick hiding behind being afraid of shadows, deny me access to legally obtained content on my devices, walk back on previous deals, and so on, then I have no problem with getting unrestricted access to stuff they decided I don’t technically own. Fuck the fucker, simple as that.

          • doodledup@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            By subscribing you agree to a contract. The company is doing no shitty practice since everything is black and white in the contract. You just don’t like the contract. But the consequence should be to not sign it.