Larry Sanger, one of Wikipedia’s cofounders, was banned from editing the site indefinitely after other editors determined he was canvassing, or in other words, calling on his followers off platform in order to influence Wikipedia’s content.

Sanger has spent more than a decade criticizing Wikipedia for what he claims is an ideological, left-wing bias on a variety of topics, and on X has framed this recent ban as further proof of everything that’s wrong with Wikipedia. The New York Post took that bait and last night published an article with the headline “Left-leaning Wikipedia blocked founder from editing site—after he campaigned to make it more balanced.”

Wikipedia editors obviously reject that framing and say that Sanger was banned for wielding his followers to sway discussion and decision making on Wikipedia. The discussion that led to the decision to ban Sanger concluded with what an editor called a “clear consensus” to ban Sanger.

  • ComradePenguin@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 hours ago

    How is it biased? Biased towards truth? If you have proof of it lying or misrepresenting something, then you just have to prove it and I am sure they or you will be able to change it.

    • Bread@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      9 hours ago

      They will not let you change it. They gate keep who gets to edit things intensely.

      • ComradePenguin@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        9 hours ago

        For good reason, there is a lot of interest in implementing actual bias.

        Israel/Palestine/Gaza is examples of this.

        Do you have any examples of bias? Or wrong information?