• MangoCats@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    We’ve been rolling along with weak IDs on the internet since the beginning. Strong, secure identification would change the nature of most of these problems. It would make anonymity a choice instead of an illusion, you want to be anonymous, you have to work at it. As things are, people think they’re anonymous, but they really aren’t - and yet most services treat people as if they are anonymous so people tend to act that way.

    • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Strong, secure identification would change the nature of most of these problems. It would make anonymity a choice instead of an illusion,

      wrong. it would take away the choice.

      • MangoCats@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Wrong yourself. Strong secure identification would be required in places that require identification. Users and useees would make a conscious choice when they are going to act anonymously or allow anonymous participants.

        Already 99% of the web effectively identifies users well enough for law enforcement to track them down, this would just bring that process into the light, and when you want anonymity you would take necessary steps to make it true, instead of a false security blanket like all the BTC idiots talked like they had before (and even after) Dredd Pirate Roberts got taken down.

      • MangoCats@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        If you’re going to TOR and discard all tracking cookies, and only use anonymized contact methods (not e-mail accounts linked to your credit cards…) then you’re on the right track.